Lansing is blessed with a wonderful symphony orchestra, several fine choirs, a host of excellent theater companies (professional and amateur), ballet and even community bands. But what the city has struggled with over the years is creating and maintaining an opera company.
Under Melanie Helton’s leadership, Michigan State University has grown a fine opera department which presents very good student opera performances, but the Lansing community has never been able to put the money together along with resources and talent to sustain a company of its own.
Lansing opera lovers have had to listen to the FM radio on Saturday afternoon, drive to Detroit or Chicago, or take a chance with the traveling shows that came to Wharton Center – with uneven quality.
But for the last couple of years, Wharton’s Executive Director Mike Brand, tried to fill the void. He has brought in Detroit’s Michigan Opera Theater to the Great Hall for a one-show-only production each season. The MOT is a superb company that is housed in an extraordinary, new (well, ten years old) opera house across from Comerica Park.
The Lansing productions are not “road shows”, then, but rather the complete opera (soloists, chorus, full orchestra and sets) that was just performed on the Detroit Opera House stage. They tear down the set and rebuild it on the Wharton stage. The addition of the MOT/Wharton shows has been a welcome success in Lansing.
This year (5/22/08), the MOT brought one of the opera world’s most beloved works, Verdi’s “La Traviata”, to town. Just having seen two sumptuous NY MET operas on the movie screen (“Daughter of the Regiment” and “La Boheme” – see previous posting) I was interested to see if an old fashioned stage opera still holds up.
My answer is an unequivocal, “Yes”. The movie screen operas, a new innovation in the opera world, have great sound, acting, voices, sets and backstage goodies, but nothing compares to the real thing.
As in all theater productions, one must see the entire stage at one time to understand the drama of the story – even though “La Traviata” admittedly does not have much stage action. To hear real unamplified voices blending with a real orchestra is a magical experience.
The Lansing MOT production had its minor flaws, but overall was ravishing and beautifully sung.
When we first met Erin Wall as Violetta, the courtesan and toast of Paris night life, her voice as a bit harsh and lacked subtlety. But as the opera continued, Ms. Wall got better and more confident. By the end of the evening, the audience was taken away by her huge, rich sound that also had darkness, depth and beauty. Her low range was slightly weak, but her coloratura flourishes as well as her lyrical passages were stunning and exciting.
Mark Panuccio, as Alfredo, had a lovely tenor voice, but didn’t quite have the ease and phrasing as Ms. Wall. His acting was natural and believable as the destroyed lover of Violetta.
One of the most interesting characters in “Traviata” is Germont, Alfredo’s father. Because of Violetta’s low status in society, he finds it imperative to convince her to leave Alfredo, but is conflicted and torn by this decision. As Germont, Luis Ledesma adds little depth to this tragic person. His diction was difficult to understand and his acting stiff.
But these blemishes did not take away from MOT’s by and large superlative production. The opera had a lovely flow to it, the orchestra was a joy to hear, and of course Verdi’s sensuous, flowing and lush melodies make for some of the most beautiful music ever composed.
One hopes that the San Francisco and Metropolitan opera company’s movie-house operas, as excellent as they are, will not detract from appreciating real singers, on a real stage, singing their hearts out for you.
Thank you Wharton and MOT for bringing real opera to Lansing.
Tuesday, May 27, 2008
Sunday, May 18, 2008
Muffit's Surprise
For the Lansing Symphony’s final offering of the 07-08 season, music director Timothy Muffitt programmed a concert that had some unexpected surprises.
Since most orchestra concert goers have a great fear of “modern” music, conductors usually sandwich the dreaded work between two beloved favorites, so season subscribers can’t escape the concert hall. During the intermission, the bemused listeners will say that the new piece was “interesting” or maybe even “lively”. Certainly by the end of the concert most folks will have forgotten it completely – which is OK because it’s likely they’ll never hear it again anyway.
But Maestro Muffitt did something different this time. He placed the new work, David Maslanka’s “In Lonely Fields” at the very beginning. Gutsy move, I’d say.
But in reality it was a well calculated move. Muffitt knew he had a winner here.
Maslanka, a man who has a special affinity for the breadth of sound of percussion instruments, surrounded the abbreviated orchestra with seven percussionists. A marimba player and vibraphone player were in the front of the ensemble, and five other players with various mallets, African and traditional percussion instruments spread across the back of the stage.
What resulted was a positively wonderful work of dazzling beauty, deep emotion and evocative sounds of the earth. Graciously, Muffitt had all seven drummers come out to the front of the stage at the beginning of the work for a bow, as if they were piano soloists. In fact, watching them make their magic with literally dozens of shakers, bangers and such was a delight. But the real joy was hearing the lovely blending of the orchestra with the percussion instruments.
Maslanka wrote the work in memory of a Central Michigan University percussionist who died from an auto accident at age 24. His parents commissioned the work and Maslanka gave them the most heartfelt memorial one can image.
After the Maslanka, the LSO played one of the most popular and familiar pieces in the classical repertoire, Incidental Music to “Peer Gynt” by Edvard Grieg. And here was the surprise.
Although we all know the Grieg from music appreciation classes to Saturday morning cartoons, it sounded hopelessly simple and uninteresting next to the invigorating Maslanka. As I sat listening to the movie-music sounding “Peer Gynt”, my mind kept on going back to the new and refreshing piece before. So, during the intermission, instead of discussing the hackneyed “Peer Gynt” most people were talking about the exciting Maslanka, a work I’d love to hear it again.
Muffitt concluded the evening with the ravishing Sibelius Symphony No. 2, his most popular symphony. Muffitt gave the work his rapt attention to detail and intensity – two elements of his conducting style that he has displayed to the Lansing audiences amply since he took over the helm of the orchestra last year.
The symphony is one with great heroic themes and sounds that bring out the vast Finnish landscape. Sibelius makes the most of pairing the low brass with the low strings to produce deep grandiose chords. The orchestra came up to Muffitt’s demands, for the most part. All the soloists were excellent, but at times I would have wanted to hear a violin section that was twice as large to give those Sibelius chords the heft they required.
All in all, Muffitt and his musicians brought forth a sincere and passionate reading of this work which seems to straddle the 19th and 20th century.
Since most orchestra concert goers have a great fear of “modern” music, conductors usually sandwich the dreaded work between two beloved favorites, so season subscribers can’t escape the concert hall. During the intermission, the bemused listeners will say that the new piece was “interesting” or maybe even “lively”. Certainly by the end of the concert most folks will have forgotten it completely – which is OK because it’s likely they’ll never hear it again anyway.
But Maestro Muffitt did something different this time. He placed the new work, David Maslanka’s “In Lonely Fields” at the very beginning. Gutsy move, I’d say.
But in reality it was a well calculated move. Muffitt knew he had a winner here.
Maslanka, a man who has a special affinity for the breadth of sound of percussion instruments, surrounded the abbreviated orchestra with seven percussionists. A marimba player and vibraphone player were in the front of the ensemble, and five other players with various mallets, African and traditional percussion instruments spread across the back of the stage.
What resulted was a positively wonderful work of dazzling beauty, deep emotion and evocative sounds of the earth. Graciously, Muffitt had all seven drummers come out to the front of the stage at the beginning of the work for a bow, as if they were piano soloists. In fact, watching them make their magic with literally dozens of shakers, bangers and such was a delight. But the real joy was hearing the lovely blending of the orchestra with the percussion instruments.
Maslanka wrote the work in memory of a Central Michigan University percussionist who died from an auto accident at age 24. His parents commissioned the work and Maslanka gave them the most heartfelt memorial one can image.
After the Maslanka, the LSO played one of the most popular and familiar pieces in the classical repertoire, Incidental Music to “Peer Gynt” by Edvard Grieg. And here was the surprise.
Although we all know the Grieg from music appreciation classes to Saturday morning cartoons, it sounded hopelessly simple and uninteresting next to the invigorating Maslanka. As I sat listening to the movie-music sounding “Peer Gynt”, my mind kept on going back to the new and refreshing piece before. So, during the intermission, instead of discussing the hackneyed “Peer Gynt” most people were talking about the exciting Maslanka, a work I’d love to hear it again.
Muffitt concluded the evening with the ravishing Sibelius Symphony No. 2, his most popular symphony. Muffitt gave the work his rapt attention to detail and intensity – two elements of his conducting style that he has displayed to the Lansing audiences amply since he took over the helm of the orchestra last year.
The symphony is one with great heroic themes and sounds that bring out the vast Finnish landscape. Sibelius makes the most of pairing the low brass with the low strings to produce deep grandiose chords. The orchestra came up to Muffitt’s demands, for the most part. All the soloists were excellent, but at times I would have wanted to hear a violin section that was twice as large to give those Sibelius chords the heft they required.
All in all, Muffitt and his musicians brought forth a sincere and passionate reading of this work which seems to straddle the 19th and 20th century.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)