As I sit in
front of my 50-inch television with surround sound and access to an infinite number
of channels and programs, you may wonder: what could he possibly complain about?
After all, I
clearly remember the TV watching experience of my youth. The high-tech
equipment we owned was a 12-inch black and white TV loaded to the gills with three
channels – ABC, CBS and NBC.
All of the
shows available were from those networks and were only presented once during
the season, with some sporadic reruns appearing during the summer. After hours
(midnight to 8am or so) the TV offered only a weird graphic that was called a
Test Pattern.
TV viewing was
simpler back then and very regimented.
All programs had lots of commercials, the TV sound quality was tinny, and all shows were broadcast on a strict schedule. If you happened to be out of the house at 8:30 on a Thursday night and missed your favorite show, you were totally out of luck. It was lost and gone forever, never to be seen again (except now on YouTube).
Compared to
today’s world of broadcast technology, that was like the ice age.
The journey
from the days of the test pattern to today’s world of dazzling sound and color
was slow but steady. color TV started to become popular in 1970 and soon after,
cable burst on the scene.
Fast forward
to 2022 and TV screens are as wide as the wall they’re hanging on (85-inch TVs are
not unusual), complete with amplifiers, speakers, and an almost infinite array
of program offerings. You even can record any show you want, to be seen time and
time again.
Well, you
may say, that sounds…..heavenly. So, again, where’s the problem? What’s your
beef?
Despite the
astounding improvement in TV technology, I find the experience of what to
watch, how to watch it, and what should I subscribe to, to be a very confusing (and
expensive) affair. It’s like going to a buffet with a table as long as a football
field, laden with every possible dish I’ve ever dreamed about. What should I choose?
The confusion
begins at the beginning. What equipment should I buy?
Back at the birth
of the TV world, there were no choices at all.
We bought a TV set that brought the broadcast channels in by an outside
antenna or an interior one, affectionately called “rabbit ears”. And everyone
throughout the country had the exact same experience.
TV watching
was a community activity. When “I Love Lucy”, “Milton Berle”, “Ed Sullivan Show”,
or “The Honeymooners” appeared on TV, the entire country watched them at the
same time, no choices. And the next day,
everyone talked about it at work or school.
And there
was only one TV set per household.
So, now our
TVs are not those small boxes of the fifties, but giant screens with multiple speakers
throughout the viewing area. We can
watch theatrical movies with the viewing experience rivaling that of actually
sitting in a movie theater – only better in some ways.
Watching at
home, we can talk about the movie while it’s playing without getting sneers
from other paying customers, eat entire meals in front of the set, or even
pause the flick to make a visit to take a tinkle. Also we can stop the movie
altogether, and when we continue the watching the next day, it will remember
where we left off.
No more
antennas for receiving the signal. Now, we can watch by purchasing a cable
subscription or a satellite dish subscription.
But wait, things
are changing yet again.
For the last
couple of decades, we have been tied to the cable/dish system. We subscribe to
a selection of channels (hundreds of them) with a few premium channels for an
extra charge. But now technology has matured so we are being urged to “cut the
cable” and go to streaming – a combination of your smart TV plus your internet
– for all of our watching needs.
But back to
the bewildering choices we are faced with:
Now we have additional channels we can acquire – Hulu, Disney+, HBO, Apple
TV, Paramount, Starz, Netflix, Amazon Prime, Brit Box, Sling TV, TNT, Cinemax and
many more. And there’s a charge for each one.
What to
watch – that’s a challenge too.
No more
looking at the week’s TV schedule in the paper.
The selections defy category. You could opt to see theatrical movies
(classic to new), old TV shows, or international TV shows. Premium cable
channels also offer original movies, limited series, recuring series, documentaries.
There are so
many options that the daily TV schedule listing in your daily newspaper (what’s
that!) can’t begin to list everything. There are no universal schedules and new
programs are released anytime. We have no idea when a new season of our
favorite series will be released, or even if it will be released.
To know
what’s available, we have to conduct a rather thorny search of websites,
listings and reviews. But that usually won’t do the trick either – friends will
tell us about a series we must see that, despite our hours of research, we've never heard of.
It’s all a complex game.
When you
have finally identified the movie or show that you want to see on a given
evening, don’t take it for granted that you can actually access it with all the
hundreds of channels you have at your disposal. Not on your life. That would be too easy.
There is another
catch. Yes I know you have spent hundreds of dollars per month for abundant
watching options, but doubtless you will find that you don’t have the correct
channel to see the particular show you’ve identified with your favorite actors
and story line.
So now you
have to consider buying yet another subscription ($5-$15 per month) just to
watch that show.
That’s not
all. Maybe you don’t have a smart TV
which means you won’t be able to get the channel anyway. You’ll have to buy another piece of hardware
– like a Roku or Chromecast – to access other channels. Which, of course, will
force you to add yet another remote control, to your existing gaggle of remotes
that reside on your coffee table. Five
or six of them is not usual (and they’re all black, not easy to find the right
one!).
Five bucks a
month doesn’t seem like a lot to spend to watch good quality shows but before
you know it you’re buying several channel subscription, Netflix, Amazon Prime,
HBO, Starz to name just a few, and your monthly entertainment bill begins to grow
like weeds in your garden.
Oh, one more
thing. Even if you buy all those
subscriptions and a Roku and whatever, there are invariably movies you want to
see that are still on none of the channels or gizmos you have. They are offered
on a rental basis - $3.99 is a common charge for one movie.
Wait, your
nightmare is not over. To add to the turmoil, depending on your set-up you may
have to add your personal password to order some of these additional shows, or
even re-order some premium channels, so get ready to upgrade your own personal
tech skills.
So now,
relaxing on the La-Z-Boy to enjoy your favorite movie may not be such a relaxing
experience after all. It is often fraught with frustration, sorting through various
remotes, finding passwords, looking through various channels to find the lost
program you want to see and more.
NO, I don’t
want to go back to the old days of three channels and a small black and white
set, but you must agree that watching TV today can be a hornet’s nest of technology,
hardware, schedules, passwords, sound bars, and a dizzying choice of options.
Are the
pleasures worth the challenging obstacle course we must complete to enjoy the
entertainment? Probably so, but
sometimes not.
4 comments:
Love it!
I agree Ken. We now use an antenna and Hulu and Passport and who knows what else. Our problem is remembering how to get to stuff!
Dr. Glickman: we may be confused; however, Ruben understands it all!😇
Back in the day, computers supported multiple users through various like IBM's Time Sharing Options (TSO system).
One issue with those systems was called thrashing. That is where more time was spent swapping tasks in-and-out than actually working on them. The user experienced slow or frozen performance.
Ironically, the key to "going faster" and slowing down was to shuffle through the tasks more slowly. Rather than spending 70% of the time moving data and problem structure into the core-memory and 30% manipulating it with the CPU, fewer "juggles" per second meant each job had a better work-vs-move ratio.
I wonder if artificially restricting your universe of channel choices might improve your joy-to-angst ratio. Maybe pick ONE sports channel and one news channel for Wednesday (different one for Thursday and so-on) so you will not scroll through endless versions of espnyxzz and cnnfoxcspan
Just a thought.
Post a Comment